Yeah but yeah but yeah but

One must begin from the Little England Series, and recall that in these days of changing ways and changing discourses, many of the Church of England icons of the older kind would often wax lyrically about those poor old RCs over yonder who had a problem with boy abuse in a gay clerical subculture, gayness assumed, much like the two boyos who fathered children in America just for abuse purposes, sentenced then to 100 years of prison time, but the Lord Nolans and Baronesses Camberlege and Baronesses Scotland though these were nice, used to preside in splendour over the tommy rot and tommy riddle of many RC monastery public schools where allegedly parties were endemic and monks were accused of approaching rich boys by rich boys keen to make up their measeley subs and allowances from Daddio with a quick compo case. These cases involved buying ice creams for the boys. But here we must digress and make a distinction between boy abuse routinely alleged for political purposes, like the much bemoaned Anne Boleyn circulating such rumours about abbots and priors because they clung onto papal loyalism in an Age of the absolute monarch, and then the real thing of frolicking in the quads with young men and their boys. Because so many executions took place against papal loyalism the charge of boy abuse was routinely levelled against gay abbots and their priors and monks on their way up to the gallows hastily erected and no due process just snobby reformation judges giving sermons to the accused, though in facto many of the monks were innocent, it was simply a political ploy designed to make those guilty of papal loyalism pay for their attachment to the Old Faith of Jesus and the apostles, a cynical way also to turn the average housewife and her Joe Public against the monastery quads too. So there is a tradition of this charge being artificially attached to a sort of papal loyalism to the Old Faith - all such cases were called "montaturae negativae" of the worst kind. Naughty. Usurping young concubine queen Anne Boleyn was jealous herself of the way that so many clerics and monks and their canon lawyers simply came to the defence of Catherine in those fated times when Henry wished his wedding annulled by the church judges in faraway Rome. Spiritual jealousy of the Acts 2 kind is a terrible thing especially when it occurs between two women fighting for the king's hand. Like Diana and the old dear now very quaint and antique Camilla. Similarly the Lords and Ladies dancing of the Old Church of England maybe often allowed that old tradition to bite against the RC monasteries, without looking into the real cases against monks and real charges. They presided presidingly over the RC monks in that presidential way that was so superior than they, holier than thou, keener than the king for justice for the rich young boys a few who themselves practised disloyalty for a fast buck for their cynical Daddios - these latter then had the money to pay the fees, in a series of very cynical compo scams. They presided over the RCs in such abandon and in such superiority, looking down long noses, that when eventually the story about worse even worse abuse than buying ice creams for boys, indeed of the most painful penetrative kind, came out around the learned grey bishops of Canterbury, everybody who was anybody was naturally shocked and appalled - it was all a load of hypocritical cant - the reformation judges of the Old Church of England turned out to be worse than the RC monks on this old charge which had now become an old canard. And worse. Found among the very judges appointed by the crown, itself under pressure for minor abuse in the case of one or two of the princes courtesy of a friend in the stock markets called Geoff. Worse than worse. Stitch ups. The learned bishops of the RCs accepted it all so meekly and without rancour that at times for moderne humans rights lawyers, it all looked like collusion of the old kind in Ulster. But it is otherwise now in the Real Church of England where all is innocence and light.